Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Extending the securitization safe harbor
    2010-06-04

    The FDIC voted to extend the safe harbor provided under 12 C.F.R. § 360.6 until September 30, 2010, from the FDIC’s ability, as conservator or receiver, to recover assets securitized or participated out by an insured depository institution. When the safe harbor was initially adopted in 2000, the FDIC provided important protections for securitizations and participations by confirming that, in the event of a bank failure, the FDIC would not try to reclaim loans transferred into such transactions so long as an accounting sale had occurred.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Securitization & Structured Finance, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Safe harbor (law), Accounting, Adoption, Depository institution, Precondition, Grandfather clause, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), FSAB, Code of Federal Regulations
    Authors:
    Kenneth E. Kohler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    Swaps pushout rule: Federal Reserve clarifies treatment of U.S. branches of foreign banks
    2013-06-06

    The Federal Reserve has issued an interim final rule clarifying the treatment of uninsured U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks under Section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Act ("Swaps Pushout Rule"). The interim final rule clarifies that, for purposes of the Swaps Pushout Rule, all uninsured U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks are treated as insured depository institutions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Swap (finance), Depository institution, Credit default swap, Grandfather clause, Federal Reserve (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Authors:
    Luigi L De Ghenghi , Susan C. Ervin , Randall D. Guynn , Annette L. Nazareth , Lanny A. Schwartz , Margaret E. Tahyar , Andrew S. Fei , E. Ashley Harris , Jai R. Massari , Gabriel D. Rosenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days